Book Name:	 Innovative  Solutions:  A  Systematic  Approach  Towards  Sustainable  Future 	
Manuscript Number:	Ms_BPR_3724.31	
Title of the Manuscript:	RICCI SOLITONS ON LP-SASAKIAN MANIFOLDS WITH RESPECT TO QUARTER SYMMETRIC METRIC CONNECTION	
Type of the Article	Complete Book Chapter	

 PART   1:  Review Comments

 Compulsory  REVISION comments	Reviewer’s comment	Author’s Feedback (Please correct the manuscript and highlight that part
in the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)	
Please write a few sentences regarding the importance
of this manuscript for the scientific community. Why
do you like (or dislike) this manuscript? A minimum of
3-4 sentences may be required for this part.	The linear connection of this paper is equation (2.15), which is Quarter-symmetric non-metric connection.
The title of this paper “RICCI SOLITONS ON LP-SASAKIAN MANIFOLDS WITH RESPECT TO QUARTER SYMMETRIC METRIC CONNECTION”  will be

“RICCI SOLITONS ON LP-SASAKIAN MANIFOLDS WITH RESPECT TO QUARTER SYMMETRIC NON-METRIC CONNECTION”. As a result, equations (2.16) and (2.17), which are the main equations of this paper, are also incorrect.		
Is the title of the article suitable?
(If not please suggest an alternative title)	
“RICCI SOLITONS ON LP-SASAKIAN MANIFOLDS WITH RESPECT TO QUARTER SYMMETRIC NON-METRIC CONNECTION”		
Is the abstract of the article comprehensive? Do you
suggest the addition (or deletion) of some points in this section? Please write your suggestions here.	OKAY.		

Are subsections and structure of the manuscript
appropriate?			
Please write a few sentences regarding the scientific correctness of this manuscript. Why do you think that this manuscript is scientifically robust and technically sound? A minimum of 3-4 sentences may be required for this part.			
Are the references sufficient and recent? If you have suggestions of additional references, please mention them in the review form.
-			
 Minor  REVISION comments

Is the language/English quality of the article suitable for scholarly communications?			
 Optional/General  comments			

PART  2: 
	
	Reviewer’s comment	Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the manuscript and highlight that part in the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)	
Are there ethical issues in this manuscript? 	(If yes, Kindly please write down the ethical issues here in details)	

Reviewer Details:	
Name:	Ajit Barman	
Department, University & Country	Ramthakur College, India